Principal source: Zouhar, K., 2002, Cynoglossum officinale, Fire Effects Information System [online], U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, , Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory;
United States Geological Survey- Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Aug. 2006, Species Abstracts of Highly Disruptive Exotic Plants at Scotts Bluff National Monument Cynoglossum officinale, United States Department of the Interior;
McAdoo, J.K., Johnson, W.S., Wilson, R.E., Donaldson, S., & Graham, J., 2002, Fighting Invasive Weeds- A Northeastern Nevada Landowner's Guide to Healthy Landscapes, University of Nevada, Reno, Cooperative Extension Service.
Compiler: National Biological Information Infratsructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
Review:
Publication date: 2007-08-07
Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2024) Species profile: Cynoglossum officinale. Downloaded from http://iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1193 on 22-11-2024.
Physical: Mechanical methods of control only work to reduce the seed bank available for re-establishment of the species. Digging and pulling are not effective in control unless the root crown of the plant is severed several inches below the surface of the soil (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002). Tilling or cultivation is a good method of control in areas with small infestations, but it has to be repeated frequently to make sure that root reserves are depleted and that new growth does not occur (McAdoo et al. 2002). Mowing several centimeters above the surface of the plant when in flowering can reduce the seed spread and seed bank, but mowing needs to be repeated to ensure that plant recovery is reduced (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Fire will probably kill the aerial portion of the plant while a severe fire may be needed to kill the taproot (Zouhar, 2002). Fire effects on this plant still need to be further studied. Postfire may help in the establishement of hound's tongue by reducing or eliminating the competition by other species opening up the canopy, etc. (Zouhar, 2002). Fire is not recommended for the control of hound's tongue at this time.
Cultural: Any control plan should have a revegetative component when dealing with hound's tongue, as bare soil from eradication will only increase the population of hound's tongue through successive generations or another weedy species could invade into the areas hound's tongue was displaced from (McAdoo et al. 2002). Regulating livestock grazing on rangeland is important so that competitive species are not overstressed and have enough vigor to recover and keep invasive species like hound's tongue from invading (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002). Overseeding with competitive grass or native species is another cultural plan that should and could be incorporated into a chemical or biological control plan.
Chemical: A variety of chemical herbicides have been used for the control of hound's tongue, picloram, 2,4,D-amine, metsulfuron (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002), chlorsulfuron, and dicamba (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Follow the label for application strengths and rates, and use the right chemical for your particular area, depending on the sensitivity of the site, other surrounding vegetation and management logistics. For small infestations, a spot spray may work best and reduce the effect the herbicide is going to have on other vegetation, wildlife, and the envrionment. Timed chemical applications in the spring or early summer on first year's growth, or in the spring when the second-years growth begins to bolt has shown 97% and 77% control respectively (USGS-NPWRC, 2006).