Physical control: While eradications may be unfeasible for widespread
Anolis wattsi invasions on islands such as St. Lucia, Daltry (2009) suggests that hand removal may be successful for local control.
Chemical control: Daltry (2009) states that
Anolis wattsi is adversely affected by heavy pesticide use on St. Lucia such as those used for agricultural purposes.
Biological control: On St. Lucia,
A. wattsi is probably preyed upon by mongoose (
Herpestes javanicus) and other invasive predators, however this has not been enough to significantly impact abundance (Daltry, 2009).
Cultural control: Due to the limitations of current control technologies, the spread of
A. wattsi is unlikely to be reversed or contained wihout harming native lizard populations (Daltry, 2009). Daltry (2009) makes several management recommendations for St. Lucia to prevent the spread of
A. wattsi to other offshore islands. These include: listing
A. wattsi as Unprotected under the Wildlife Protection Act; monitoring the spread of this species and be vigilant for signs that it is invading mature, natural forests; preventing
A. wattsi from invading the offshore islands, especially the Maria islands, by screening all boats and baggage; and supporting reptile conservation in other tropical countries by prohibiting, screening and removing anole lizards from exported cargo (Daltry, 2009).