In a recent review Terada and Yamamota (2002 in Rueness 2005) reduced G. asiatica Zhang & Xia into synonymy with G. vermiculophylla.
The morphological similarities between G. vermiculophylla and other related algal species mean that the invasion of this alga is often cryptic, requiring DNA analysis for reliable identification (Thomsen et al. 2006a; Thomsen et al. 2006b). To avoid future taxonomic confusion Thomsen et al. (2006b) recommend researchers create silica-gel, air-dried, and/or herbarium presses as voucher specimens so that the correct identification can be confirmed using morphological and molecular analysis.
G. vermiculophylla is able to grow in a wide range of temperatures (5-35 °C), light intensities (20–100 μmol photons m-2 s-1) and salinities (5-60 psu). Optimum growing conditions are between 15-25 °C and 10-45 psu (Rainkar et al. 2001; Rueness 2005). It is also tolerant to other stressses including sedimentation, desiccation, grazing and low nutrients (Rueness 2005). Nybert et al. (2009) found in one instance that this alga was able to survive in complete darkness for more than five months in the laboratory.
Principal source:
Compiler: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
Review: M. S. Thomsen, Marine Department, National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus.
Publication date: 2011-04-09
Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2024) Species profile: Gracilaria vermiculophylla. Downloaded from http://iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1698 on 22-11-2024.
In high abundance G. vermiculophylla may have dramatic effects on ecosystems. The introduction of G. vermiculophylla adds structural complexity to relatively homogenous soft-bottom systems and add new attachment sites for filamentous algae and sessile animals (Thomsen et al. 2006a; Nyberg et al., 2009). Thus G. vermiculophylla can provide shelter and food for other organisms, including microalgae, gastropods, crustaceans, polychaetes, and mny other small invertebrates. In Virginia research has shown that most invertebrate groups were positively affected by the presence of G. vermiculophylla in native algae (Thomsen et al., 2010).\r\n
While G. vermiculophylla may enhance local diversity, the ability to utilize increased habitat complexity will vary between species (Nyberg et al. 2009). Furthermore these changes could lead to effects on higher trophic levels (Aikins & Kukuchi 2002; Freshwater et al. 2006; Gustafsson 2005 in Nyberg et al. 2009; Nyberg et al. 2009; Thomsen et al. 2007c).\r\n
Loose-lying G. vermiculophylla populations have the potential to develop into dense mats, particularly in shallow bays, lagoons, harbours and estuaries. These mats can modify the habitat available for the benthic faunal community and bottom dwelling fish. Algal mats can also form physical barriers for settling larvae, decrease light intensity, increase the likelihood of anoxia and change water movement patterns, which in turn affects sedimentation rate and thus food availability for deposit feeders (Nyberg et al. 2009).\r\n
Additionally, the movement, accumulation and decomposition of G. vermiculophylla is likely to have important implications for nutrient cycling and trophic dynamics in areas it invades (Thomsen et al. 2009).\r\n
Fisheries: G. vermiculophylla is reported to be a problem in fishing industries through fouling of nets (Freshwater et al. 2000).
Prevention: Movement of oysters is a major vector for the introduction of G. vermiculophylla to new locations worldwide. Thus making sure oysters are not transplanted may reduce the incidences of new infestations (M.S. Thomsen, pers. comm. 2011).\r\n
Physical control: Mechanical removal (harvesting) of G. vermiculophylla for use in the production of agar and other applications is a potential control method (Sousa et al. 2010; Villanueva et al. 2010).