Principal source: Element Stewardship Abstract for Dioscorea oppositifolia L. (Tu, 2002)
Compiler: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
Review: Dr David Gibson. Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. USA
Ms Jennifer Thomas Graduate Student Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University at Carb
Publication date: 2005-01-24
Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2024) Species profile: Dioscorea oppositifolia. Downloaded from http://iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=296 on 22-11-2024.
\r\nPhysical: Manual and/or mechanical methods of plant removal can effectively control small isolated patches. These methods, however, are extremely time and labour-intensive, as the large, deep tuber makes manual removal very difficult. All pieces of the tuber must carefully be removed or resprouting may occur. The removal of aboveground biomass appears to eventually exhaust the tuber, and indicates that perhaps a management regime of repeated grazing or burning may also work to kill the plant. These other methods, however, have not been tried. Manually picking the aerial bulbils off the vines will not kill the plant, but will prevent the further spread of D. oppositifolia for a growing season. Once the bulbils have dispersed, hand-pulling the young germinating bulbils from soil can be an effective control measure if the entire bulbil is removed (K. Johnson, pers. comm., in Tu, 2002). Although there are no conclusive results reported from long-term fire effects on D. oppositifolia yet, Kristine Johnson of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park has noted that sites burned in a wildfire from the previous fall had reduced amounts the following year.
\r\nChemical: Herbicide application appears to be the most effective means to control large infestations. One application of some herbicides can effectively kill all new germinating bulbils, but repeat treatments are probably necessary to completely kill large underground tubers that originally supported large mature vines. The herbicides glyphosate or triclopyr have been the most successful at killing the weed. Glyphosate also significantly lowered rates of plant growth from germinated bulbils as measured by stem length and numbers of leaves.
\r\nBiological: There are currently no available biocontrol agents for D. oppositifolia. Snails and caterpillars have been observed browsing on leaves of this species, but do not appear to damage the plants significantly. Rodents and other small mammals also consume the bulbils, but the degree of consumption and damage to the plants has not been quantified (Beyerl 2001). The exact species of these consumers have not been determined, nor has it been elucidated if they are specifically feeding on D. oppositifolia or are only generalist feeders.